In a recent interview with Francesca Trinchini for Le Scienze, I reflected on a period of significant transition in the global research landscape. Political, financial, and institutional uncertainties are reshaping the conditions under which science is conducted — particularly for early-career researchers who rely on stable funding, academic freedom, and long-term perspectives.
In the United States, changes in funding priorities and increased political scrutiny of certain areas of research have prompted many scientists to reassess their professional trajectories. This is not only a personal challenge for those affected, but a systemic issue for the international scientific community. Sustained scientific progress depends on continuity, openness, and institutional frameworks that safeguard the independence of research.
At the same time, this moment presents a strategic opportunity for Europe. With a strong network of research institutions, international funding mechanisms, and a long-standing commitment to academic freedom, Europe is well positioned to serve as a stable and reliable environment for excellent, curiosity-driven science.
One example is the Transatlantic Program of the Max Planck Society, which aims to deepen cooperation between European and U.S. research communities. The program supports mobility, joint initiatives, and long-term partnerships that facilitate the exchange of ideas, methods, and people across borders, strengthening a shared scientific space.
This perspective reflects a broader principle: science is a global public good. When research environments weaken in one region, the consequences extend well beyond national boundaries. Innovation slows, collaboration diminishes, and society’s capacity to address complex challenges — from climate change to public health and emerging technologies — is reduced.
Ensuring academic freedom, supporting international mobility, and maintaining stable research structures are therefore not only institutional priorities, but core elements of responsible science policy.
For readers interested in the full interview, it is published in Le Scienze (currently behind a paywall for many). I hope this post conveys the central themes of my reflections and encourages continued dialogue on the role of science in an interconnected world.
Closing note
Following my transition to emeritus status, I will use this platform to contribute more actively to international discussions on science policy, academic freedom, and global research cooperation.